WE CURRENTLY HAVE ITEMS IN STOCK PLEASE FILL OUT THE FOLLOWING FORM AND SOMEONE FROM THE TEAM WILL BE BACK IN TOUCH WITH YOU SHORTLY WE CURRENTLY HAVE ITEMS IN STOCK, PLEASE FILL OUT THE FORM AND SOMEONE FROM THE TEAM WILL BE BACK IN TOUCH WITH YOU SHORTLY, (PLEASE CLICK HERE)
Home / Research

Research

Filter by tag:

Susceptibility of SARS-CoV-2 to UV Irradiation

Susceptibility of SARS-CoV-2 to UV Irradiation

The following is a summary of an article published August 4, 2020 by the American Journal of Infection Control.

In the journal, the authorsā€™ main finding is thatĀ SARS-COV-2Ā is extremely susceptible to ultraviolet radiation. The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) triggering a severe respiratory condition was first identified in the Hubei province of China, in December 2019. Soon the coronavirus, or otherwise termed as Covid-19, became a global health burden and caused heavy socio-economic disruption. Millions of cases have already been reported worldwide. As of now, prevention of the transmission of the virus is the only option to stop it. Especially, preventing the virus from transmitting within hospitals and other institutions is extremely necessary. Therefore, the authors investigated the susceptibility of high tier viral stocks ofĀ SARS-COV-2Ā 

to combined or separate UVA and/orĀ UV-CĀ Ā irradiation.Ā 

The authors isolatedĀ SARS-COV-2Ā from a nasopharyngeal swab. The sample was taken from a patient who was suffering fromĀ Covid-19Ā disease and was hospitalized at the Department of Infectious Diseases of the University Hospital Essen. The VirocultĀ® medium (swab was taken using it) was incubated on Vero E6, cultured in DMEM containing 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, and was supplemented with Penicillin (100 IU/ml), Streptomycin (100 Āµg/ml), Ciprofloxacin (10 Āµg/ml) and Amphotericin B (2.5 Āµg/ml).Ā 

The supernatant was harvested after five days and cell debris was removed by centrifugation. Later, for subsequent infection of a new Vero E6 cell culture flask, 100 Āµl of the clear supernatant was used. After five days, supernatants were foundĀ SARS-COV-2Ā positive by a conventional qualitative PCR. After harvesting the virus suspension and clearing cellular debris by centrifugation, it was stored at -80Ā°C. The 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) was calculated after determining viral titers by endpoint dilution assay.Ā 

Then, a viral stock at a concentration of 5 x 10^6 TCID50/ml was irradiated with UV light for up to 30 minutes. Separate or combined irradiation with UVC (254 nm) and/or UVA (365 nm) of 600 Āµl virus stock was performed in 24-well plates. The UV light source was placed 3 cm above the bottom of the plate. The light intensity forĀ UV-CĀ (254 nm) was 1940 ĀµW/cm2 and for UVA (365 nm) was 540 ĀµW/cm2 at a distance of 3 cm, as measured by radiometric analysis. This implies that the applied light dose was 1.94 mJ/cm^2/s forĀ UV-CĀ and 0.54 mJ/cm^2/s for UVA, with ĀµW = 10-6 J/s. Later, the samples irradiated with UVA were taken after 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 minutes, and that ofĀ UV-CĀ irradiation after 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 15 minutes. Each sample's TCID50/ml was determined by endpoint dilution.Ā 

According to the authors, high viral loads of 5 x 10^6 TCID50/ml SARS-COV-2 were completely inactivated by aĀ UV-CĀ dose of 1048 ml/cm^2 in just 9 minutes. Moreover, 50% of the virus was inactivated after just 1.4 minutes of UV treatment, as calculated by nonlinear regression. One log reduction of the viral load was observed after 9 minutes of irradiation with an emitted dose of 292 mJ/cm^2. However, a 9-minute exposure toĀ UV-CĀ ( emittedĀ UV-CĀ dose of 1048 mJ/cm^2) resulted in the complete inactivation of the virus. Therefore, according to the authors,Ā UV-CĀ irradiation is a more effective method of inactiveĀ SARS-COV-2.Ā 

Therefore, the observation and experimentation done by the authors prove thatĀ SARS-COV-2Ā is highly susceptible to irradiation with UV light. The authors hence conclude thatĀ UV-C, inarguably, is a suitable disinfection method forĀ SARS-CoV-2Ā